Off Topic comments from: Random Thoughts thread

[Richard Burns]

How did the moderators get the notification that George Washington was me when I used my house computer to register as Richard Burns but I used the iPhone to register as George Washington?

IMHO people should be allowed to have as many accounts as they want anyway.

[Trail]

Why would you need more than one account per person?

[DoctorP]

How did the moderators get the notification that George Washington was me when I used my house computer to register as Richard Burns but I used the iPhone to register as George Washington?

IMHO people should be allowed to have as many accounts as they want anyway.

Your opinion doesn't count for shit as far as number of accounts is concerned.:thumbdown:

Anyone else would have had their IP address banned a long time ago, so be happy and quit your complaining.

[dk]

How did the moderators get the notification that George Washington was me when I used my house computer to register as Richard Burns but I used the iPhone to register as George Washington?
We're smart like that.

[Richard Burns]

Your opinion doesn't count for shit as far as number of accounts is concerned.:thumbdown:

Anyone else would have had their IP address banned a long time ago, so be happy and quit your complaining.

Show me where I complained. I'm pretty sure I simply asked a question and made an opinion.

[Richard Burns]

We're smart like that.


Thanks at least you actually gave an answer instead of starting trouble. :first:

[bli182_2001]

damn those trouble makers RB, some of us like seeing you on here, and if not its always fun for some to hit the groan button on yea?

[P_chan]

How did the moderators get the notification that George Washington was me when I used my house computer to register as Richard Burns but I used the iPhone to register as George Washington?

IMHO people should be allowed to have as many accounts as they want anyway.


Well once both people post exactly the same it's pretty easy:rolleyes:

[Richard Burns]

Why would JU ban a second account when that account is on your side and making fun of RB?

[Richard Burns]

Well once both people post exactly the same it's pretty easy:rolleyes:

I call bullshit. Washington's post was so general there is NO way it could have been narrowed down to be me. Further more he was making fun of RB so you definitely wouldn't have pcked uo on it.

You're guys software somehow sniffed me out.

[DougP]

Why would JU ban a second account when that account is on your side and making fun of RB?

Because its fun. :)

[DougP]

I call bullshit. Washington's post was so general there is NO way it could have been narrowed down to be me. Further more he was making fun of RB so you definitely wouldn't have pcked uo on it.

You're guys software somehow sniffed me out.

It was pretty obvious actually. :D

[Richard Burns]

Because its fun. :)

Lol I know I bet it is. Thank you. This is good you're giving answers like an adult. Instead of answering like a little **** as others do around here. It's appreciated. :first:

[P_chan]

I call bullshit. Washington's post was so general there is NO way it could have been narrowed down to be me. Further more he was making fun of RB so you definitely wouldn't have pcked uo on it.

You're guys software somehow sniffed me out.

Short term memory loss? Remember all those "split personality" type posts you make against yourself? He signed up and jumped right into a thread and attempted to make fun of you. Oh and on top of that your IP matched up with his.


It doesn't take a rocket scientist but I can see how an RB would have trouble with it.:rolleyes:

:edit: LOL like a little bitch. RB, who makes multiple accounts in an attempt to get more attention?

[dk]

You're guys software somehow sniffed me out.
Nope. You are just that easy...

[Richard Burns]

:edit: LOL like a little bitch. RB, who makes multiple accounts in an attempt to get more attention?


Or the people that choose to respond and feed into his madness because thy want attention. They could just ignore him but they are out for attention instead.

[DougP]

Ha ha ha ha Someone put RB in timeout. :D

[DoctorP]

Or the people that choose to respond and feed into his madness because thy want attention. They could just ignore him but they are out for attention instead.

Easier to just ban him and let him cool the **** off. Do you have a freakin' life?



*note* feel free to answer after your ban! :cool:

[P_chan]

ROR I can see RBs face right now. I bet he's feverishly making a new account too:D:D:D

[DougP]

Easier to just ban him and let him cool the **** off. Do you have a freakin' life?



*note* feel free to answer after your ban! :cool:

He might actually get some work done now. :D

[dk]

Come on... Why is RB banned?

[Richard Burns]

I'll try to behave myself for one week. If things improve I'll continue to behave. But if people start their crap I'll go back to mine.

New RB starting...............


5

4

3

2

1


New RB activated.

[DoctorP]

I'll try to behave myself for one week. If things improve I'll continue to behave. But if people start their crap I'll go back to mine.

New RB starting...............


5

4

3

2

1


New RB activated.

IF things improve? Remember one thing RB, the forum will survive without you. If you improve you will not be banned again. How's that?:rolleyes:

[Richard Burns]

IF things improve? Remember one thing RB, the forum will survive without you. If you improve you will not be banned again. How's that?:rolleyes:
The old RB would really lay into you for this baiting post. But not I. Say what you want. I will not stoop to the level of childish arguments.

[dk]

Childish? That was fact.

I'd be careful around the mods. :)

[DoctorP]

The old RB would really lay into you for this baiting post. But not I. Say what you want. I will not stoop to the level of childish arguments.

Let the old RB step back in, and he will not come back, neither will you.

[P_chan]

Childish? That was fact.

I'd be careful around the mods. :)

Childish like telling new user's they're not welcome?:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

[DJ Tak]

It seems that RB only has issues with a select group of people. The problem with that is the fact that the select group of people are the Mods.

[P_chan]

It seems that RB only has issues with a select group of people. The problem with that is the fact that the select group of people are the Mods.

Wouldn't really say that. He has a knack for exploding on anyone he feels is "censoring" him. He flipped out on jh104, a new member, just last night. Even went as far to tell him he wasn't welcome here. Seems kinda counter productive IMO:rolleyes:.

[bli182_2001]

RB is on a week long trial period, We need to start a poll now to see if he makes it?

[dk]

RB is on a week long trial period, We need to start a poll now to see if he makes it?
What? "New RB" trial period? How many "New" RB's have there been by now? I can think of at least three... Maybe four...

[bli182_2001]

very true!! DK maybe he has seen the light well at least for this week?

[dk]

very true!! DK maybe he has seen the light well at least for this week?
I am betting against ever seeing a New RB.

[P_chan]

Hasn't he tired to "turn over a new leaf" several times in the past?

[DoctorP]

Hasn't he tired to "turn over a new leaf" several times in the past?

Evidently he can't pick that ****er up! :rolleyes::D

[P_chan]

LOL how do random thoughts go off topic:D:D:D

[Richard Burns]

Hasn't he tired to "turn over a new leaf" several times in the past?


That's right and I failed. That doesn't mean I'm going to give up. I might even take it as to always agree with the JU status quo. LOL.

Say what you must. Cast your stones for I need not to retaliate with conduct contrary to my good character but exercising my ability to combat by opponent with intelect, grace and maturity.

[DougP]

LOL how do random thoughts go off topic:D:D:D

That's what I was wondering. :D

[DoctorP]

That's right and I failed. That doesn't mean I'm going to give up. I might even take it as to always agree with the JU status quo. LOL.

Say what you must. Cast your stones for I need not to retaliate with conduct contrary to my good character but exercising my ability to combat by opponent with intelect, grace and maturity.

ROFLMMFAO!!!!:D:w00t:

[Richard Burns]

LOL how do random thoughts go off topic:D:D:D

It's a logical impossibility. It's actually obsurd. But I understand JU had to make a leadership decision and it was to censor the old RB which was necessary because that guy was bad news.

[P_chan]

That's right and I failed. That doesn't mean I'm going to give up. I might even take it as to always agree with the JU status quo. LOL.

Say what you must. Cast your stones for I need not to retaliate with conduct contrary to my good character but exercising my ability to combat by opponent with intelect, grace and maturity.

http://www.eltoroweakly.com/images/ror.jpg

It's not about always having to agree with everyone on JU RB. It's about you not flying off the handle and doing things like making multiple accounts or telling new users they're not welcome simply because they see straight through your BS. Just because you've been here longer then new users that doesn't mean you can push them around.

Nor are you a mod, despite your attempts to act as such:rolleyes:.

[Richard Burns]

ROFLMMFAO!!!!:D:w00t:


Laugh if you want. Say and do as you will. I'm not here to bait or start flame wars. If this gets your jollies off than so be it. :thumbup1:

[DoctorP]

It's a logical impossibility. It's actually obsurd. But I understand JU had to make a leadership decision and it was to censor the old RB which was necessary because that guy was bad news.

obsurd or absurd? :rolleyes::D

[DJ Tak]

DoctorP doesn't let up on this dude.

[DoctorP]

DoctorP doesn't let up on this dude.

this dude needs to learn there are times he should keep his mouth shut.:rolleyes:

[DougP]

DoctorP doesn't let up on this dude.

He brings upon himself though. :)

[DJ Tak]

this dude needs to learn there are times he should keep his mouth shut.:rolleyes:

So is this a battle of wills? Domination?

On a side note, has it been deemed a violation of the rules to create multiple accounts?

[Richard Burns]

obsurd or absurd? :rolleyes::D

I haven't the slightest clue nor did I make any attempt to find out. :D

[P_chan]

When is it necessary to create a duplicate account and what is the purpose of creating another account? To avoid a ban maybe, or to flame bait other users possibly?

[DJ Tak]

When is it necessary to create a duplicate account and what is the purpose of creating another account? To avoid a ban maybe, or to flame bait other users possibly?


Or to groan forum members while lacking the balls to do it under your regular user name........

See where I am going with this?

[P_chan]

Or to groan forum members while lacking the balls to do it under your regular user name........

See where I am going with this?

Leeway has been given before, and it has been given to RB. Your point?

[DoctorP]

Or to groan forum members while lacking the balls to do it under your regular user name........

See where I am going with this?

That is one thing RB was doing. Thanks for pointing that out and making our argument stronger!:thumbup1:


It usually isn't necessary to state that multiple accounts are not allowed. We have always deleted them in the past, and he is aware.

Now the rules have been updated.

[DoctorP]

I haven't the slightest clue nor did I make any attempt to find out. :D

such a waste of an i-phone...I'm sure there is a spell check app.:rolleyes:

[Richard Burns]

Some members are exempt from the rules.
But that's fine. It ain't right but some things are uncontrolable.

I might be missing something here but I see real life and the Internet as two very different things.

I hope those who have met me in person know how I am.

I thought the purpose of JU is entertainment.

Anyhow I'm not here to get in a pissing contest with the board. I'm here and I'm behaving myself and I'd like to keep it that way.

- Burns

[P_chan]

No, some users may get away with less of a punishment depending on the situation. However, habitual offenders will be dealt with more harshly. Different offense require a different level of punishment. From ignoring to warnings and even banning, it all depends on the situation.

[Richard Burns]

That is one thing RB was doing. Thanks for pointing that out and making our argument stronger!



I'd love to see proof. I did no such thing. I groan people under MY own user name. I made another account and groaned myself.

I see we stooped so low as to make false accusations.

So be it. You will not make me fly off the handle. I refuse to let you win. Keeping baiting me if you want to waste your time and energy because I will not give in.

[DoctorP]

I'd love to see proof. I did no such thing. I groan people under MY own user name. I made another account and groaned myself.

I see we stooped so low as to make false accusations.

So be it. You will not make me fly off the handle. I refuse to let you win. Keeping baiting me if you want to waste your time and energy because I will not give in.

I do not feel like going through and locating them, nor do I need to...since the above statement you just supported me by stating you logged in and groaned your own account with a different account. You also logged into different accounts and made posts.

If you don't like the rules, feel free to go, I'm sure JT will accept you or JREF or OU, or somewhere.

You are welcome to remain here though, don't take that the wrong way...but only as one person, not four.

[Richard Burns]

It's all good. Water under the bridge. Like I said I'll behave myself. I would just appreciate if doing so gets positive results.

[Richard Burns]

What's JREF?

[DougP]

What's JREF?

Another Japan forum. :)

[Richard Burns]

So is it safe to assume that "The Groaner and The Thanker", Manbearpig and other multiple accounts will be banned as well?

Are rules rules or do rules apply to different people in different ways or not at all in some cases?

For the record I'm not starting crap either I'm genuinely curious.

[DoctorP]

So is it safe to assume that "The Groaner and The Thanker", Manbearpig and other multiple accounts will be banned as well?

Are rules rules or do rules apply to different people in different ways or not at all in some cases?

For the record I'm not starting crap either I'm genuinely curious.

You are starting crap....here comes the "but he does it" argument.


Everything is at the discretion of the admin/moderation team.

[DougP]

So is it safe to assume that "The Groaner and The Thanker", Manbearpig and other multiple accounts will be banned as well?

Are rules rules or do rules apply to different people in different ways or not at all in some cases?

For the record I'm not starting crap either I'm genuinely curious.

I was under the impression that you no longer wished to utilize those old accounts. Why does it bother you now that they are no longer available?

[Haru-sa]

I drink beer...

[Tanimaga]

RB has lots of intelect. I mean intellect.

People messpell alot! I nver do.

[Richard Burns]

You are starting crap....here comes the "but he does it" argument.


Everything is at the discretion of the admin/moderation team.


The "because he/she is allowed to do it" argument is very valid in most situations. If one is allowed to do something than so should the others.

The way of JU having different rules for different people is equal to having no rules at all.

I'm not starting anything. I'm asking very clear, cut and dry questions.

[Haru-sa]

The "because he/she is allowed to do it" argument is very valid in most situations. If one is allowed to do something than so should the others.

The way of JU having different rules for different people is equal to having no rules at all.

I'm not starting anything. I'm asking very clear, cut and dry questions.


There is nothing more unequal than the equal treatment of unequal people

-Thomas Jefferson

[DougP]

The "because he/she is allowed to do it" argument is very valid in most situations. If one is allowed to do something than so should the others.

The way of JU having different rules for different people is equal to having no rules at all.

I'm not starting anything. I'm asking very clear, cut and dry questions.

I'm pretty sure you would have gotten away with it if:

1.) You didn't abandon two accounts to make a fresh start and then log back into those old accounts drawing even more attention to yourself. (Usually we ban accounts when people no longer wish to use them.)

2.) Continually making digs at the moderating staff. Especially after every time your request to become a mod gets turned down.

Hey, I'm with you on trying to have some consistency with the rules. I'm also for allowing some leeway. Its hard to keep cutting you slack though when you continue to paint a target on yourself. No matter what, DK has the final say and if he's ok with one or two "extra" accounts that's his call. If you annoy him to the point where he wishes to ban your other accounts that's on you. This was probably because you used them to log back in after being temp banned (not a smart move). You had a good run with the multiple, yet similar, personalities, but it looks like that has come to an end. If you can cool it with the requests to become a mod (it got old after the third or fourth time) and declaring that the new RB is coming, every week, I'm sure that might take some of the heat off you. :)

[Richard Burns]

So it's like the military. Even of something is allowed in the rules the facists can still make you comply with what they want you to do.

[DougP]

So it's like the military. Even of something is allowed in the rules the facists can still make you comply with what they want you to do.

Kinda. :) Its actually more like this, JU is DK's kingdom, and the best advice is not to annoy the king.

[Richard Burns]

I gave that up a long time ago. I'm more into having good conversations and not starting trouble anymore.

I like you people in real life and that's what matters to me.

But the way I'm censored on JU gets ridiculous at times.

[DougP]

I gave that up a long time ago. I'm more into having good conversations and not starting trouble anymore.

I like you people in real life and that's what matters to me.

But the way I'm censored on JU gets ridiculous at times.

Your "stop censorship" sigs and user titles gets annoying at times too. :)

[Haru-sa]

So it's like the military. Even of something is allowed in the rules the facists can still make you comply with what they want you to do.

dude, that's embarassing. if you want to be a mod, act appropriately and you'll eventually get asked. At least most forums work that way.

VBulletin is pretty damn powerful and scalable too; no doubt that your behaviors on a primary account looked damn similar to those of the additional personalities you sported. If anyone (a mod) really wanted to, they could provide all the proof that they'd need in a screenshot or two.

mods police other mods, out of the spotlight in mod only areas; that's just the way it works. Don't make this "all about you" because it's not. Frankly, none of us are so important that the mods would get together and find new/creative ways to torture you.

My advice: BaKON n WaFfelz for you; it'll fill you up, but not for too long.

[DougP]

Frankly, none of us are so important that the mods would get together and find new/creative ways to torture you.


Well............................... :grin1:

[Richard Burns]

Acting appropriately is one thing. But there have been times I've gotten in trouble for things that are with in the rules. That was my biggest gripe. IMHO mods should only be allowed to enforce rules not tell member's to change their signature just because they don't like it.

[Crazysix]

I gave xxx xx a long xxxx xxx. x'x xxxx xxxx xxxxxxx good xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxx xxx xxxxxxxx trouble xxxxxxx.

X xxxx xxx xxxxxx xx xxxx xxxx xxx xxxx'x xxxx xxxxxxxx to me.

But xxx xxx I'm xxxxxxxxxx xx XX xxxx ridiculous at times. there ya go bro didnt want you to feel left out

[Haru-sa]

Acting appropriately is one thing. But there have been times I've gotten in trouble for things that are with in the rules. That was my biggest gripe. IMHO mods should only be allowed to enforce rules not tell member's to change their signature just because they don't like it.


less time griping, more time enjoying life...:thumbup1:

[DougP]

Acting appropriately is one thing. But there have been times I've gotten in trouble for things that are with in the rules. That was my biggest gripe. IMHO mods should only be allowed to enforce rules not tell member's to change their signature just because they don't like it.

Your other sigs that were deleted were not within the rules. Besides, what does rule 17 say? :) And you also continuously violate rules 18, 19, 20 and sometimes 24.

[Crazysix]

Acting appropriately is one thing. But there have been times I've gotten in trouble for things that are with in the rules. That was my biggest gripe. IMHO mods should only be allowed to enforce rules not tell member's to change their signature just because they don't like it.

I like your avatar..so change it:D