View Full Version : Off topic posts from "Obama objects to releasing photos" thread
P_chan
05-16-2009, 08:04 AM
http://raoworld.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/double-facepalm.jpg
Are you admitting you have no answers or that my answer is correct? You seem to be lacking the ability to formulate any semblance of a valid counter argument.
Read the caption and notice how it relates to the part in bold, not that hard.:rolleyes:
I'm admitting that it's futile to even "formulate any semblance of a valid counter argument" against you zim. Remember my brick wall analogy? I tire of the constant contradictions and generalizing of entire groups of people, it's not even funny anymore.
But I digress, this has nothing to do with the topic so I'll let it be. I also don't care for flame baiting all that much.:rolleyes:
Zim the Invader
05-16-2009, 10:48 AM
http://raoworld.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/double-facepalm.jpg
Read the caption and notice how it relates to the part in bold, not that hard.:rolleyes:
I'm admitting that it's futile to even "formulate any semblance of a valid counter argument" against you zim. Remember my brick wall analogy? I tire of the constant contradictions and generalizing of entire groups of people, it's not even funny anymore.
But I digress, this has nothing to do with the topic so I'll let it be. I also don't care for flame baiting all that much.:rolleyes:
I see you've opted for the 'you'll never get it' path of avoidance. Very cunning of you. I was expecting either the 'you're just a racist' or the 'right wing wacko' approach to your ducking of the question. I guess you're just too shifty for me to keep up with.
P_chan
05-16-2009, 11:36 AM
Nevermind, it' just too funny and I guess sad at the same time:rolleyes:
Now excuse me I'll go hang out with the rest of the sheeple
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f195/oldskoolveedub/roflcopter.gif
ok now it's funny again
Zim the Invader
05-16-2009, 12:36 PM
Nevermind, it' just too funny and I guess sad at the same time:rolleyes:
Come on now, I like to laugh just as much as the next guy. Please, share with the rest of us what you find so funny. Although I must admit that I'm having a hard time finding humor in the idea that this administration is more concerned about flaming the past administration than creating a healthy economy, decreasing unemployment, or fixing health care to name a few.
So again I ask, what good, if any, do you think was supposed to come from fanning the flames of contention for a past administration? How did the release of these memos help make the country safer? How did the uproar caused by telling the public about this issue and then reversing the policy make us more morally superior when reversing the policy and not creating an uproar would have accomplished the same thing? Please enlighten us.
You often claim that I write from a self created pedestal of intellectual appointment. Well here you go, teach me something. You imply that I'm not worth explaining it to, but I think the truth of the matter is that you can't make a valid argument to the contrary.
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 10:42 AM
Thread bump. Still wondering what pchan thinks is so funny.
P_chan
05-17-2009, 10:49 AM
Come on now, I like to laugh just as much as the next guy. Please, share with the rest of us what you find so funny. Although I must admit that I'm having a hard time finding humor in the idea that this administration is more concerned about flaming the past administration than creating a healthy economy, decreasing unemployment, or fixing health care to name a few.
So again I ask, what good, if any, do you think was supposed to come from fanning the flames of contention for a past administration? How did the release of these memos help make the country safer? How did the uproar caused by telling the public about this issue and then reversing the policy make us more morally superior when reversing the policy and not creating an uproar would have accomplished the same thing? Please enlighten us.
You often claim that I write from a self created pedestal of intellectual appointment. Well here you go, teach me something. You imply that I'm not worth explaining it to, but I think the truth of the matter is that you can't make a valid argument to the contrary.
Guess some people can't see the forest for the trees huh?
Just blame it on the sheeple zim! Keep on preaching to the herd, from the herd!
Richard Burns
05-17-2009, 11:57 AM
So in other news the Bears score 22.
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 12:00 PM
Guess some people can't see the forest for the trees huh?
Just blame it on the sheeple zim! Keep on preaching to the herd, from the herd!
Are you ever going to answer any questions or are you just going to shift focus until people give up? You imply I'm wrong, which implies you know the correct answer. So if you know, why not share it? If not, why not admit it? I can't speak for everyone, but your repeated skirting of the questions looks more like running than knowledge.
P_chan
05-17-2009, 12:49 PM
LOL like I said zim, there is no point if you can't see the forest for the trees. Maybe after you remove the blinders from your eyes, but not now and not in the foreseeable future.
I also never claimed to be right. Wouldn't dare steal that trait from you;). So keep on stalking this thread, it won't do you any good.
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 01:08 PM
LOL like I said zim, there is no point if you can't see the forest for the trees. Maybe after you remove the blinders from your eyes, but not now and not in the foreseeable future.
I also never claimed to be right. Wouldn't dare steal that trait from you;). So keep on stalking this thread, it won't do you any good.
Do you even understand the meaning of the word "imply"? I said that you imply that I'm wrong, which implies you know the answer.
Keep running. Like I said, you try and discredit my views but won't even post your own. If you don't have the faith in your argument to post it for others to see, how strong an argument could it be?
You should come with a warning.
http://www.salagir.com/gfx/troll-web.jpg
P_chan
05-17-2009, 01:17 PM
Enjoy yourself zim, but look at yourself before you speak of trolling or flame baiting.
retributionnk
05-17-2009, 01:20 PM
Nevermind, it' just too funny and I guess sad at the same time:rolleyes:
Now excuse me I'll go hang out with the rest of the sheeple
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f195/oldskoolveedub/roflcopter.gif
ok now it's funny again
I wish that place was a bed and breakfast. I could have a tall stack of ROFL******s with a side of Raple syrup.
HAHA! I can't say w a f f l e s on JU.
P_chan
05-17-2009, 01:32 PM
Yeah get yourself a nice piece of ROFL ass:D
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 01:41 PM
Felt that it didn't belong her so I moved off topic remarks between zim and I here (http://www.japanupdate.com/forum/showthread.php?t=12063)
Well, isn't that appropriate. I see you're adding abuse of power to your repertoire.
P_chan
05-17-2009, 01:47 PM
I will move your post and mine to the other thread, don't post anything off topic in the other thread again;).
No if I was going to abuse my power I would give you and infraction for replying to a moderators message. Simply cleaning up the other thread for other users who might want to actually debate the real issue at hand because I know I don't care to debate it.
But yes, if you have a problem with the way I moderate a thread send me a PM directly instead of making snide remarks. Or take it up with dk.
Well, isn't that appropriate. I see you're adding abuse of power to your repertoire.Only in your wildest, wettest dreams zim:rolleyes:
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 02:05 PM
Felt that it didn't belong her so I moved off topic remarks between zim and I here (http://www.japanupdate.com/forum/showthread.php?t=12063)
Despite your objections, I feel that asking you to explain your views on this subject rather than insult mine, constitutes a valid remark. If you feel that I am wrong in my interpretations of the subject matter being discussed, put forth a valid counter argument instead of creating an alternate thread clearly aimed at insulting me. So, show me and the others where my logic on the photos is incorrect.
P_chan
05-17-2009, 02:12 PM
And I've clearly stated numerous times that I don't care to state my opinion on the subject and who are you to demand that I do? I created the alternate thread because the posts were getting off topic, simple as that. Still don't plan on debating this subject so just drop it unless you want even more posts moved to the other thread.
By continuing to ask me to state my opinion you're dragging the thread off topic, hence why I split the thread.
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 02:27 PM
And I've clearly stated numerous times that I don't care to state my opinion on the subject and who are you to demand that I do? I created the alternate thread because the posts were getting off topic, simple as that. Still don't plan on debating this subject so just drop it unless you want even more posts moved to the other thread.
By continuing to ask me to state my opinion you're dragging the thread off topic, hence why I split the thread.
No, you didn't. I would have respected that and not pushed. You did, however, repeatedly pass judgement on me and my opinion. I have no problem letting this go, but in the future, don't insult me for stating an opinion. If the only contribution you have is to insult someones ON TOPIC post instead of giving a counter argument, perhaps you shouldn't be surprised when people take offense.
Crazysix
05-17-2009, 02:39 PM
how about thiis.........why dony bpoth you act like fuqinq adults.
Zim stop trying to pick a part every little thing that is posted and taking this shit to personal
P leave zim alone....he wants e-fight let him its kinda hard to fight by yourself
FY,I P didnt abuse his power... he cleaned up the thread.....and if you have problem with that or anything that he does you know the correct way to deal with it ....and that does not include being a bitch and putting your "issue in the chat box..........do not do that shit again
P_chan
05-17-2009, 02:43 PM
Which is exactly why I split the thread C6. It was becoming constant bickering and didn't belong in the other thread.
That was my attempt to "act like an adult" and put an end to the bickering, but some people must beat the dead horse no matter what.
retributionnk
05-17-2009, 02:43 PM
man, JU drama! Apparently I need to pay more attention to the chatbox.
Crazysix
05-17-2009, 02:45 PM
man, JU drama! Apparently I need to pay more attention to the chatbox.
man you get the popcorn I got the beer
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 02:55 PM
how about thiis.........why dony bpoth you act like fuqinq adults.
Zim stop trying to pick a part every little thing that is posted and taking this shit to personal
P leave zim alone....he wants e-fight let him its kinda hard to fight by yourself
FY,I P didnt abuse his power... he cleaned up the thread.....and if you have problem with that or anything that he does you know the correct way to deal with it ....and that does not include being a bitch and putting your "issue in the chat box..........do not do that shit again
Here we go again. This isn't the first time he insults me, implies I'm wrong, and then won't give an explanation why. If I'm wrong, explain why. Or groan and move along. Or just don't post. How hard is that? But when he insults me, I ask him his opinion, he insults me again, I again ask his opinion, again he insults me, then I post the troll thing, Suddenly I'm the bad guy. That's just discrimination.
As far as the chat box goes, I wanted to make sure I got heard. I have no idea how far the hand of mod reaches. If I post the issue in a thread he could remove it, if I report it he can respond and then who knows what happens to it. If I put it in the chat box it gets seen. Maybe not for long, but long enough. I feel he abused his power and I wanted it known. And if I felt he abused it once, what would stop him from doing it again to cover it up?
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 02:59 PM
Which is exactly why I split the thread C6. It was becoming constant bickering and didn't belong in the other thread.
That was my attempt to "act like an adult" and put an end to the bickering, but some people must beat the dead horse no matter what.
There was no bickering until you insulted my post for no reason! If you had disagreed and given a counter argument, or even disagreed and said you had no desire to post a counter argument, that would have been one thing. But you came off as making a personal attack on my argument for no reason at all. I took it as personal because your response to my post was negative but had nothing to do with the subject matter.
Crazysix
05-17-2009, 03:02 PM
Here we go again. This isn't the first time he insults me, implies I'm wrong, and then won't give an explanation why. If I'm wrong, explain why. Or groan and move along. Or just don't post. How hard is that? But when he insults me, I ask him his opinion, he insults me again, I again ask his opinion, again he insults me, then I post the troll thing, Suddenly I'm the bad guy. That's just discrimination.
As far as the chat box goes, I wanted to make sure I got heard. I have no idea how far the hand of mod reaches. If I post the issue in a thread he could remove it, if I report it he can respond and then who knows what happens to it. If I put it in the chat box it gets seen. Maybe not for long, but long enough. I feel he abused his power and I wanted it known. And if I felt he abused it once, what would stop him from doing it again to cover it up?
1, IM not here to insult you, I was giving a warning...simply because you can gt banned from chat only...
2. If he insulted you over and over again...catch the hint, either he has no reasonable response or he is baiting you...ethier way you sstill fall for it
3.if a post is reported it will be looked at and not deleted or changed.
4, if he, in your opinion, abused his power, pm dk, doug or docP
5, He may have insulted you but i dont see him abusing his power........he is giving you a ration, just as you have done to him in the past and he is not using his mod status to threaten, intimidate or influence you .
Just be a man and stop playing im right -no-im right game.
Blues
05-17-2009, 03:05 PM
The mere ridicule of an opinion (or lack thereof) does not constitute abuse.
Moving posts does not constitute abuse.
A good suggestion is to let it go and move onto something else more fun to talk about.
Richard Burns
05-17-2009, 03:08 PM
I have to say I don't think P-Chan abused his power.
Now an abuse of power would be what The Prosecutor did.
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 03:18 PM
1, IM not here to insult you, I was giving a warning...simply because you can gt banned from chat only...Thank you. Sorry to have come off as snippy.
2. If he insulted you over and over again...catch the hint, either he has no reasonable response or he is baiting you...ethier way you sstill fall for itI know I was persistent in my want of his opinion. But he didn't say he didn't want to give one until much later. I should have seen his flame baiting but I didn't.
3.if a post is reported it will be looked at and not deleted or changed.Good to know.
4, if he, in your opinion, abused his power, pm dk, doug or docP I did, but it's hard to have faith in many mods when you feel you are being singled out by one of them.
5, He may have insulted you but i dont see him abusing his power........he is giving you a ration, just as you have done to him in the past and he is not using his mod status to threaten, intimidate or influence you .
Just be a man and stop playing im right -no-im right game.
I feel the abuse of power came with the original title of this thread which was "A new thread for zim to contradict himself over and over again". If the split had been simply to move our debate of the issue to a place where the heat of our posts didn't sway the original thread, that would have been one thing. But to move it to a thread with an insulting title after all the defamatory posts, to me that's abuse. Asking another mod to do it if they felt it was warranted would have been more appropriate. But I feel he insulted me in the original thread and then exercised his power by doing it again and more directly with the new title.
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 03:20 PM
I have to say I don't think P-Chan abused his power.
Now an abuse of power would be what The Prosecutor did.
I wasn't here for that, so I don't know what happened, so I can't use that as a referrence. What happened?
Crazysix
05-17-2009, 03:27 PM
now that you have calmed down...... listen it may appear to be abuse or you are being singled out but look at like this....he was on your ass before he was mod....as for the title hell ive done it to muku many times and and this was prior to being made a mod.....
I will observe you 2, but zim state your view, argue your point but dont take shit talking too serious. Alot of people here disagree with what you say, but damn man, Its your opinion, and they cant take it away from you.
Like I said, be a man and just ignore what you feel is irrelevant or a provocation to get you in to an e fight.,
P_chan
05-17-2009, 03:59 PM
keep in mind that if I change thread titles or posts, other mods and the admin can see it. So there is no real secret mod ring that goes around editing posts.
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 05:05 PM
now that you have calmed down...... listen it may appear to abuse or ou are singled out but look at like this....he was on your ass before he was mod....as for the title hell ive done it to muku many times and and this was prior to being made a mod.....
I will observe you 2, but zim state your view, argue your point but dont take shit talking too serious. Alot of people here disagree with what you say, but damn man, Its your opinion, and they cant take it away from you.
Like I said be a man and just ignore what you feel is irrelevant or a provocation to get you in to an e fight.
I know he was on my ass before he was a mod. I know I'm not the first person to get in a fight here. I also know that it takes two to tango and I share part of the blame for things getting out of hand. And while I still think it's BS to make derogatory posts about someone else's opinions without giving reason, it's also not the first time he's done that either. Such is life. But I felt the abuse of power came when he added to the insulting connotation of those posts by then moving the posts in which I put him in the spotlight into a new thread with a title meant to insult me. It looked to me like he was uncomfortable being called on the carpet for his unwarranted rudeness and so he chose to move those posts into a thread with a title chosen specifically to start the reader with a negative impression of me in order to cover up his disrespectful behaviour. But, since I can't prove any of this unless he admits to it (which is highly unlikely), and given it's his word against mine and, him being more trustworthy by virtue of title, mine is not likely to win, I'll have to let it go.
The mere ridicule of an opinion (or lack thereof) does not constitute abuse.
Moving posts does not constitute abuse.
A good suggestion is to let it go and move onto something else more fun to talk about.
Common sense would dictate that if a moderator is involved in a heated discussion with another member said moderator should not imo be involved in any way what so ever with said moderation of any posts on that thread
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 06:01 PM
Common sense would dictate that if a moderator is involved in a heated discussion with another member said moderator should not imo be involved in any way what so ever with said moderation of any posts on that thread
Especially to then split the thread and move the posts to a new thread with a title designed to cast discredit upon the person who A) is given as the reason for the split and B) is the person who the Mod themselves was fighting with.
That is where I took issue with abuse of power. Other mods have split threads, even ones where I have been involved in the derailing of the thread. But not to name the split in such a way as to insult the person they themselves are arguing with. That's basically saying "you're an idiot and your argument is worthless. Let me move it over here to the "(insert name here) is an idiot" thread that I've started just so people can see how dumb you really are."
Crazysix
05-17-2009, 06:03 PM
Common sense would dictate that if a moderator is involved in a heated discussion with another member said moderator should not imo be involved in any way what so ever with said moderation of any posts on that thread
Damn muku besides moving the side conversation off to the side....he did nothing else....there was no infractions or warnings P did good, beside being a slight smart ass, but hey he didnt blurr the lines
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 06:12 PM
Damn muku besides moving the side conversation off to the side....he did nothing else....there was no infractions or warnings P did good, beside being a slight smart ass, but hey he didnt blurr the lines
I don't think you caught the original title of this thread.
Splitting the thread was the right thing to do. The title is no longer what it once was so just let it go. I know you won't though since it is something more for you to argue about and you thrive on that.
Muku, you bring up a good point, but splitting the thread was still not an abuse of power by P. P even posted in the mod forum saying that if anyone else felt it was the wrong thing to do, then to merge them back, but everyone seems to agree (this was even before the "abuse of power" accusation).
I don't think you caught the original title of this thread.
Which was actually kind of funny to pretty much anyone that actually reads your posts... You just took it way too personally and are trying to make it a bigger deal than what it really is.
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 06:34 PM
Splitting the thread was the right thing to do. The title is no longer what it once was so just let it go. I know you won't though since it is something more for you to argue about and you thrive on that.
Muku, you bring up a good point, but splitting the thread was still not an abuse of power by P. P even posted in the mod forum saying that if anyone else felt it was the wrong thing to do, then to merge them back, but everyone seems to agree (this was even before the "abuse of power" accusation).
He acted as judge and jury at his own trial. He and I got into it a bit. Ok, split the thread. But doing it himself and in the way he did it was abusive. If I cut out the posts where I look bad and put them into a new thread with a title that makes the other person look bad wouldn't that be wrong? A little rewriting of history to make me the winner? The abuse of power was brought up as soon as I noticed the new thread. dk got a message, I made a comment in the thread, the post was reported, and then in the chatbox, in that order.
And I don't "thrive" on arguing. But I'm not going to back down when I feel attacked just because I'm out numbered. I have been in plenty of discussions where arguments didn't arise. I do my best to argue my point without being disrespectful. I do mess up and get personal, but even then I would feel comfortable saying that mostly happens when I feel attacked. I don't head into any discussion trying to piss people off. I think it's a great source of pride when you can argue a point in such a way that other people end up saying "you may have a point. I should rethink this." But when people want to get personal I have no problem reciprocating because they are showing their unwillingness to see the other side of things, if only to try it on. The more personal they get, the firmer I want to stand my ground.
Zim the Invader
05-17-2009, 06:51 PM
Which was actually kind of funny to pretty much anyone that actually reads your posts... You just took it way too personally and are trying to make it a bigger deal than what it really is.
I am usually on the side that is not in the majority. Naturally I'm not going to be looked at favorably. But that doesn't make me an idiot, nor does it make his claims that I regularly contradict myself accurate. How many times have you been misquoted or had an opinion from a topic you find unrelated dragged over into a new topic and used against you because the other person considers the topics linked? Or clearly been discredited on one issue because someone switches the focus from topic A by stating your opinion of topic B which the majority disagree with, thereby rallying the support of topic A to their side because nobody wants to look like they are supporting your view of B. I know I've had that happen multiple times.
z's inmate#2341
05-17-2009, 11:02 PM
Zim, Pchan is an idiot most times. How why he became a moderator I dont know. vast majority of his posts are pointless. Let it it go
P_chan
05-17-2009, 11:58 PM
Zim, Pchan is an idiot most times. How why he became a moderator I dont know. vast majority of his posts are pointless. Let it it go
refrain from personal insults
Zim, Pchan is an idiot most times. How why he became a moderator I dont know. vast majority of his posts are pointless. Let it it go
Are you being sarcastic or something? If you have an issue with someone being a moderator, take it up with dk.
P_chan
05-18-2009, 12:03 AM
I admit that I shouldn't have made the title what is was which is why I changed it. But I still stand by my decision to split that thread.
As far as me being an idiot......:rolleyes:
P_chan
05-18-2009, 12:05 AM
Common sense would dictate that if a moderator is involved in a heated discussion with another member said moderator should not imo be involved in any way what so ever with said moderation of any posts on that thread
Ah, looks like someone misses TP:rolleyes:
What's the definition of a heated argument? Only person I saw getting heated was zim at my dismissive attitude towards his demands. Since I wasn't going to play into his game I decided I better split the thread because it was going nowhere fast.
Zim the Invader
05-18-2009, 03:07 AM
Ah, looks like someone misses TP:rolleyes:
What's the definition of a heated argument? Only person I saw getting heated was zim at my dismissive attitude towards his demands. Since I wasn't going to play into his game I decided I better split the thread because it was going nowhere fast.
As I recall, the reason I was getting "heated" is because you mocked my intelligence and understanding of the subject. I gave an opinion and you insinuated I was too stupid to understand what you felt was really going on even if it were laid out for me. When I asked you to do so, you didn't say you didn't want to (as you claimed), you posted more insinuations that I was stupid. Had you posted a reason for your difference in opinion, posted that you had no interest in posting your opinion, or simply not posted if the only thing you had to contribute was insults, then I wouldn't have gotten heated. You've previously stated that I am predictable when someone does the sort of thing that you did. If that's true, then you knew I was going to become "heated: and you did it anyway. Why? What purpose did it serve?
Zim the Invader
05-18-2009, 03:13 AM
I admit that I shouldn't have made the title what is was which is why I changed it. But I still stand by my decision to split that thread.
As far as me being an idiot......:rolleyes:
FINALLY. Was that so hard?
And yes, the thread needed to be split. But I still stand by my opinion of why it headed down the road it did to begin with.
DoctorP
05-18-2009, 03:23 AM
ok...so basically we have two "people" standing by their opinions. Other than that not much else said. Thank you for your time!
P_chan
05-18-2009, 03:27 AM
ok...so basically we have two "people" standing by their opinions. Other than that not much else said. Thank you for your time!
LOL Yeah but one of them is an idiot:rolleyes:
A'Sharad
05-18-2009, 03:49 AM
Cant we all just get along?
OtisPMerriweather
05-18-2009, 09:00 AM
Common sense would dictate that if a moderator is involved in a heated discussion with another member said moderator should not imo be involved in any way what so ever with said moderation of any posts on that thread
Damn!
Now we got mods here with no common sense!
This place is headed to the shitter, fast. If only there were someone here to show us how things are SUPPOSED to be done...
P_chan
05-18-2009, 09:06 AM
Cant we all just get along?
No because everyone else is an idiot:rolleyes:
:rolleyes:
I could have told you that a long time ago!! Idiot!!:rolleyes::rolleyes:
No you're the idiot, idiot:D:D:D
Damn!
Now we got mods here with no common sense!
This place is headed to the shitter, fast. If only there were someone here to show us how things are SUPPOSED to be done...
It's because all the mods are idiots.
Are you being sarcastic or something? If you have an issue with someone being a moderator, take it up with dk.
Actually, no, that falls under the, "Don't waste dk's time" rule. :D
If you're Nana, though, you can complain to me about anything.
Damn!
Now we got mods here with no common sense!
This place is headed to the shitter, fast. If only there were someone here to show us how things are SUPPOSED to be done...
Where could we ever hope to find such a person?!!! :argh14:
:D
Crazysix
05-18-2009, 01:01 PM
Nana is HAWT!!!!
DougP
05-18-2009, 01:39 PM
Common sense would dictate? More like some people never hesitate to dictate.:rolleyes:
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.